Making sense of the Thursday Night Football deal

After over two years of speculation, the NFL has finally sold half of its Thursday Night Football slate… in a way no one could have anticipated.

As the NFL started ramping up the bidding process for the new package over the past month, some of the details that started coming out were head-scratching. The NFL expressed its preference to put the games on broadcast, not cable, which eventually grew to the point of basically insisting on it. The NFL also expressed its desire to simulcast the games on NFL Network.

Neither of these made any sense to me. The whole point of selling the games, I would have thought, was to get networks like NBCSN or FS1 to pony up the subscriber-fee-backed dough to take on programming that could boost those subscriber fees to the moon, to say nothing of ESPN protecting its own turf or Turner propping up TruTV or giving a boost to TNT. Broadcast networks have started catching up to cable with their retransmission consent fees, but the possibility of cord-cutting, or technologies like Aereo, could always be lurking in the background, and their owners continue to put their emphasis on cable wherever possible; the first twelve years of the college football playoff, after all, will still be on ESPN. Certainly the big four broadcast networks would fall over themselves to get the package, though it’s still the bank of crappy games NFLN has had for the past two seasons, but they wouldn’t pay nearly as much as cable networks would. And what did the NFL expect to gain by simulcasting games on NFL Network? Did they really think Time Warner Cable and Cablevision were so stupid they would treat NFLN as though it still had a full-season schedule despite the fact they could get 6-8 of its games anyway on a broadcast network? The NFL seemed to want it both ways.

I wonder if the key to the NFL’s thinking was the fact that this was a one-year deal (although the eventual deal also contains an option for a second year). I wonder if the NFL was floating a trial balloon to see how much money the Thursday package was worth, while also seeing what the reaction of cable companies might be to NFLN losing a bunch of games without actually having NFLN suffer too much – perhaps not wanting to lose people used to turning on NFLN on Thursday nights. The NFL might also want to see how much of TNF’s ratings, which are substantially behind those of the NFL’s other packages, are because of NFLN’s limited distribution or the crappy bank of games, while trying to build an audience for the games on the broadest distribution platform available and get more people used to watching the NFL on Thursday night. Perhaps they floated out feelers to Comcast, Fox, Turner, and ESPN and didn’t like the potential bids they got, so they decided on a different approach that could boost the value of the package and help them determine what balance of rights fees to boosting NFLN to strike. Depending on what the ratings are on CBS and NFL Network for each half of the package, as well as what the reaction of cable companies will be, the NFL may decide to sign a longer-term deal with a cable network, or keep more games on NFL Network again, or something else entirely.

But I can’t help but wonder if this marks a turning point in the bigger picture. The last few years have seen more and more events move from broadcast to cable and the accompanying explosion of the sports TV wars. Now the kingpin of American sports has seemingly moved in the opposite direction, and put a package on broadcast that might otherwise have seemed destined for cable. It may be a small step, but I hold out hope that when we look back, it marks the point the tide started to turn in broadcast’s favor – though the NBA could end up having a bigger impact on that later this year.

(I am surprised at CBS’ win, not because of their strong Thursday primetime lineup, but because of the same reason I didn’t see FS1 winning the package: it was just too awkward for CBS to take on a conference-agnostic package alongside having all the non-primetime AFC games. I thought NBC was the favorite, more because of synergy with their Kickoff and Thanksgiving night games than because of their weak Thursday primetime lineup, with ABC being second favorite by default.)

The Studio Show Scorecard for Week of December 16-22

PT Rnk

MM Rnk

TD Rnk

Nov Distr.
(000)
PT Vwr
(000)
LW/LY TD Vwr
(000)
TD HH TD Vwr
LW/LY
MM Vwr
(000)
MM HH

1

=

1

=

1

=

97370

3060

-12%

1161

0.8

-2%

624

0.5

=

=

84%

3060

-14%

1161

-3%

-10%

624

-5%

2

+1

2

=

2

+1

97407

656

+70%

307

0.2

+26%

249

0.2

=

=

84%

656

+32%

307

+19%

+5%

249

+9%

3

-1

3

=

3

-1

72066

206

-84%

135

0.1

-61%

115

0.1

+1

=

62%

278

+17%

182

-55%

-11%

155

-15%

5

+2

6

+4

4

+3

74882

157

+17%

85

0.1

+34%

46

0.0

=

+2

65%

204

+1%

111

+51%

+31%

60

+31%

4

+1

7

=

5

-1

78139

187

+11%

76

0.0

-8%

45

0.0

+5

+3

67%

233

+217%

95

-1%

+81%

56

+2%

6

-2

5

+2

6

-1

59078

153

-27%

68

0.0

-6%

49

0.0

-3

-1

51%

252

-29%

112

-7%

-7%

81

+11%

8

=

4

+2

7

+2

74685

106

-10%

62

0.0

+6%

57

0.1

=

=

64%

138

+22%

81

+17%

+13%

74

+24%

9

=

8

-4

8

=

81751

104

+17%

53

0.0

-13%

43

0.0

-2

+1

71%

124

+13%

64

-18%

+37%

51

-17%

7

-1

9

=

9

-3

88556

144

-7%

52

0.0

-26%

37

0.0

-1

-5

76%

158

+14%

57

-43%

-33%

41

+3%

10

=

10

-5

10

=

70036

53

-26%

36

0.0

-31%

33

0.0

+1

=

60%

74

+56%

50

-62%

+30%

46

-31%

I’ve added a new metric of my own devising to the table above, which I call the median minute, and represents a crude attempt at measuring the viewership level at which half the minutes of the week are above that point and half below. I think this better represents the top-to-bottom health of a network, especially its studio shows, compared to the primetime and total day metrics that can be unduly influenced by live events. Generally, you would expect that, while the primetime viewership is usually higher than the total day viewership, the median minute is the reverse (and more reliably so), and a network that ranks higher in primetime than in total day will rank lower in median minute than total day and vice versa. Because I’m calculating median minute entirely on my own, comparisons to a year ago will not be available at first.

Also, when I’m taking the average of a repeated studio show and the result comes out to something with a .5 at the end, I’m going to mark it by including a “½” in the recorded number, rather than blindly rounding up as normal rounding rules would suggest, because it’s impossible for me to know what side of the line the average would actually be on. Finally, because a substantial number of (especially ESPN) studio shows took the holidays off, I may skip the next two weeks in order to catch up.

All numbers are in thousands of viewers and are from Son of the Bronx.

Read more

The Studio Show Scorecard for Week of December 9-15

PT Rnk

TD Rnk

Nov Distr.
(000)
PT Vwr
(000)
LW/LY TD Vwr
(000)
TD HH TD Vwr
LW/LY

1

=

1

=

97370

3463

+1%

1189

0.8

+1%

=

=

84%

3463

+15%

1189

+3%

+5%

2

=

2

+1

72066

1303

+82%

344

0.2

+53%

=

=

62%

1761

+43%

464

+40%

+25%

3

=

3

-1

97407

386

-29%

244

0.2

-15%

=

=

84%

386

-10%

244

-12%

-2%

5

+1

4

+1

78139

169

+13%

83

0.0

+4%

+2

+4

67%

211

+84%

103

+3%

+83%

4

=

5

+1

59078

209

-5%

72

0.0

-3%

+1

+1

51%

344

+67%

119

-17%

+36%

6

-1

6

+1

88556

155

-17%

70

0.0

+0%

=

-1

76%

170

+49%

77

-0%

+9%

7

+1

7

+1

74882

134

+47%

63

0.0

-8%

-3

-3

65%

174

-1%

83

-20%

-2%

9

-3

8

-4

81751

89

-40%

62

0.0

-24%

-1

+1

71%

106

+10%

73

-44%

+66%

8

+1

9

=

74685

118

+49%

58

0.0

-5%

+1

-2

64%

154

+69%

76

-18%

+12%

10

=

10

=

70036

72

+22%

52

0.0

+44%

+1

=

60%

100

+100%

73

 

+128%

I’m serious, I’m actually falling further behind on these scorecards, which means I’m also falling behind on the weekly ratings reports. I had said I wasn’t going to do another two-month catch-up post; the next one is going to be three months and is going to include data from October. I want to avoid either having a mass of network roundup tables or contriving a reason to put up tables from interim weeks, and it seems ESPN2 has moved Numbers Never Lie to noon ET full-time which could give me a reason to introduce a new chart, so I’m going to still do a few more weeks of these, but if I don’t see any evidence that they’re attracting any audience – and why would they when they’re so late? – I’m going to be stopping at that point.

So earlier this month Awful Announcing had a piece on how Jay and Dan’s schedules on Fox Sports Live were going to be adjusted from a Sunday-Thursday to a Tuesday-Saturday schedule, and they noted that Friday and Saturday editions of FSL tended to be the highest-rated editions, and they suggested that this was because of the quality of the lead-ins those editions had and that Fox wanted to expose Jay and Dan to those larger lead-in audiences. I was surprised by this because I hadn’t thought the Friday lead-ins were that remarkable and AA’s data was from December, after college football season ended, so I wondered if AA’s data really showed that Jay and Dan’s antics were actively a turn-off.

Lo and behold, I get to this week and the Monday and Tuesday editions of FSL actually improve on their lead-ins, which is something that should be very encouraging to FS1 in and of itself. Now, FSL’s numbers are very volatile, so this doesn’t necessarily represent FSL’s “floor” in any way; Tuesday’s episode doubled Monday’s and Thursday’s episode that actually had a relatively strong lead-in did worse than them both (though it did keep nearly three-quarters of that lead-in), but there does seem to be some evidence in favor of AA’s hypothesis; boxing has been populating Fridays the last two weeks and done well, and UFC and college basketball have been carrying the flag on Saturdays, while Sundays basically have nothing going for them. We’ll see if this move helps give the Jay and Dan-helmed editions of FSL all the more momentum.

All numbers are in thousands of viewers and are from Son of the Bronx.

Read more

An Open Letter to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler

To: Federal Communications Commission Chair Tom Wheeler
CC: Other FCC commissioners, the United States Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, the House Energy Subcommittee on Communications and Technology (and any other interested members of the House of Representatives), the National Association of Broadcasters, and all concerned citizens reading on MorganWick.com

Read more

The Studio Show Scorecard for Week of December 2-8

PT Rnk

TD Rnk

Nov Distr.
(000)
PT Vwr
(000)
LW/LY TD Vwr
(000)
TD HH TD Vwr
LW/LY

1

=

1

=

97370

3426

-2%

1177

0.8

-6%

=

=

84%

3426

+2%

1177

-4%

+1%

3

-1

2

=

97407

541

-27%

288

0.2

-21%

=

+1

84%

541

+27%

287

-15%

+6%

2

+8

3

+1

72066

717

+2290%

224

0.2

+109%

=

-1

62%

969

-34%

303

+80%

-26%

6

+2

4

+5

81751

149

+119%

81

0.1

+74%

+2

+4

71%

177

+113%

96

+219%

+93%

6

=

5

=

78139

149

+7%

79

0.0

-9%

+3

+4

67%

186

+122%

99

-8%

+94%

4

=

6

+1

59078

220

+29%

75

0.0

+7%

=

-1

51%

363

+22%

123

+8%

+13%

5

-2

7

-4

88556

186

-64%

70

0.0

-64%

+1

-1

76%

205

+74%

77

-67%

+14%

8

-3

8

-2

74882

91

-43%

69

0.0

-21%

-3

-4

65%

118

-37%

89

-16%

-0%

9

-2

9

-1

74685

79

-41%

62

0.0

-6%

-2

-2

64%

103

-20%

80

+10%

+4%

10

-1

10

=

70036

59

+59%

36

0.0

+25%

=

=

60%

82

+18%

51

 

+21%

I decided to do a straight comparison of FS1 studio shows between the week before the Oklahoma-Baylor game and this week, tracking the cumulative effect after two hugely popular games. The general pattern does seem to be one of gaining viewers, though not always in a statistically significant fashion. There’s a lot of noise involved in the numbers of both Crowd Goes Wild and Fox Football Daily, for example; it’s hard to tell how much of CGW’s drop-off is due to the NASCAR season ending leading to an exodus of viewers from NASCAR Race Hub.

A couple of other things stand out to me. First, we have another sign that Fox shouldn’t be too disappointed with Fox College Saturday, as it’s beating all the weekday afternoon shows and all of FSL’s lead-in-independent averages. Second, in both of these weeks Fox NFL Kickoff didn’t have NASCAR RaceDay as a lead-in and still did over 100,000 viewers, blowing away any other non-NASCAR studio show and being a huge standout for FS1. Considering the numbers ESPN and NFL Network get for NFL Insiders, NFL Live, Around the League, and NFL Total Access compared to NFL Matchup, Fantasy Football Now, and NFL Gameday First, Fox Football Daily should be doing a lot better than it is. If I don’t see some marked improvement in its numbers by the end of 2013 I’ll be left with the conclusion that Fox should consider tinkering with its timeslot. Putting it at 5 ET, against ATH and PTI, or 4 ET, against NFL Live, are probably bad ideas. Is the midnight ET airing, where it does much better than the first-run airings earlier in the day (and where it did nearly as well as Fox NFL Kickoff Wednesday), a test run for moving it there permanently?

  Oct 28 Dec 2
Crowd Goes Wild (least-viewed 4 airings) 35 31
Fox College Saturday (compared to 11/30) 54 67
Fox Football Daily (average of all 5 airings) 32 35
Fox NFL Kickoff 101 106
Fox Soccer Daily (least-viewed 3 airings) 15 16
Fox Sports Live 11p (least-viewed 2 weekdays) 42 34
Fox Sports Live midnight (least-viewed 2 weekdays) 42 33
Fox Sports Live 1a (least-viewed 4 weekdays) 20 46
Fox Sports Live 2a (least-viewed 3 Mon-Sat) 15 25
NASCAR Race Hub (4 live airings) 161 103
UEFA Champions League Magazine 40 15
UFC Tonight 60 88
UFC Ultimate Insider 78 23

All numbers are in thousands of viewers and are from Son of the Bronx.

Read more

The Studio Show Scorecard for Week of November 25-December 1

PT Rnk

TD Rnk

Nov Distr.
(000)
PT Vwr
(000)
LW/LY TD Vwr
(000)
TD HH TD Vwr
LW/LY

1

=

1

=

97370

3513

+11%

1254

0.9

+5%

=

=

84%

3513

+30%

1254

+3%

+15%

2

+1

2

=

97407

745

+6%

363

0.3

+8%

+1

+1

84%

745

+38%

363

+6%

+34%

3

+4

3

+3

88556

513

+277%

192

0.1

+153%

+2

+2

76%

564

+274%

211

+147%

+159%

10

-8

4

-1

72066

30

-97%

107

0.1

-63%

-8

-2

62%

41

-97%

145

-53%

-63%

6

-1

5

=

78139

139

-22%

87

0.0

+6%

+3

+4

67%

173

+96%

108

-5%

+123%

5

-1

6

-2

74882

160

-30%

87

0.1

-21%

+1

=

65%

208

+27%

113

-14%

+34%

4

+2

7

+1

59078

171

+16%

70

0.0

+21%

=

-3

51%

282

-22%

115

+40%

-9%

7

+1

8

-1

74685

134

+46%

65

0.0

+2%

+1

-1

64%

175

+79%

85

+0%

+5%

8

+1

9

=

81751

68

-24%

47

0.0

-20%

-1

-1

71%

81

-20%

55

-50%

-21%

9

+1

10

=

70036

37

-29%

29

0.0

-2%

+1

=

60%

51

-8%

40

-96%

+32%

We’re waiting another week before chiming in with analysis of the effects of Oklahoma-Baylor and Oregon-Oregon State on FS1 studio show ratings, but there is one thing that FS1 should be very, very concerned about. The Civil War was not only the most-watched show in FS1 history, it also produced the most-watched edition of Fox Sports Live. But said edition of FSL only beat the one from launch night – a record the post-Oklahoma-Baylor edition failed to break – by about 50,000 viewers. On launch night, FSL’s retention was 26.7%. Its Oklahoma/Baylor retention? Only 16.2%. FSL’s post-Civil War retention rebounded to 24%, and earlier in the week on Monday FSL kept almost all of its college basketball lead-in, but the folks at FS1 should still keep a close eye on how FSL does going forward, and don’t be afraid to conclude that some of it may not be working.

(Obviously, don’t read too much into FS1 ranking ahead of NFL Network in a week in which NFLN didn’t have a Thursday Night game.)

All numbers are in thousands of viewers and are from Son of the Bronx.

Read more

The Studio Show Scorecard for Week of November 18-24

PT Rnk

TD Rnk

Nov Distr.
(000)
PT Vwr
(000)
LW/LY TD Vwr
(000)
TD HH TD Vwr
LW/LY

1

=

1

=

97370

3177

-8%

1195

0.8

-14%

=

=

84%

3177

-1%

1195

-14%

-0%

3

=

2

=

97407

702

-20%

337

0.2

-15%

-1

=

84%

702

+49%

337

-14%

+3%

2

=

3

=

72066

1101

+15%

287

0.2

+9%

+5

=

62%

1488

+841%

388

+2%

+146%

4

+2

4

+1

74882

230

+50%

111

0.1

+32%

+2

+2

65%

299

+70%

144

+45%

+40%

5

=

5

+1

78139

179

-7%

82

0.0

+21%

-2

+3

67%

223

+3%

102

+33%

+26%

7

-3

6

-2

88556

136

-53%

76

0.0

-33%

-2

-2

76%

150

0%

83

-27%

-19%

8

=

7

=

74685

92

+11%

64

0.0

+3%

=

=

64%

120

-9%

84

-1%

-11%

6

+1

8

+1

59078

148

+68%

58

0.0

+6%

-2

-3

51%

244

-9%

96

+10%

-28%

9

=

9

-1

81751

90

+18%

58

0.0

-4%

=

=

71%

107

+30%

69

-0%

+48%

10

=

10

=

70036

52

+44%

30

0.0

+35%

+1

+1

60%

72

+100%

41

+102%

+65%

I’ve introduced a new table below, tracking the retention for SportsCenter, Olbermann, and Fox Sports Live leading out of sports events. Ratings for these shows tend to be very lead-in dependent, and you generally expect the ratings to get bigger as the lead-in gets bigger. With retention, you expect the opposite: the smaller the lead-in, the bigger the retention as more people are watching specifically for that show. That’s why the Monday SportsCenter after Monday Night Football has poor retention compared to SportsCenters later in the week despite a massive audience. (This is also going to be the main place for me to list College Football Final and select other weekly ESPN2 shows. If a show actually has more viewers than its lead-in, I list the retention as “up” to signify that viewership went “up” and also that retention tells us little in this case.)

Other than MNF, SportsCenter can usually expect to retain around two-thirds of its lead-in audience. I have a small sample size, but what evidence I do have suggests Olbermann’s retention is much lower. Then there’s Fox Sports Live; with college basketball or weak college football as a lead-in it can achieve SportsCenter-esque retention, but it really doesn’t take much for FSL to retain just a fifth to a quarter of its lead-in; Wednesday’s FSL after the Ultimate Fighter has worse retention than the following day’s Olbermann, despite Olbermann having fewer raw viewers. Perhaps most distressingly, even a re-air of the Ultimate Fighter on Sunday night bleeds a ton of viewers when FSL comes on to just 9,000 viewers.

All numbers are in thousands of viewers and are from Son of the Bronx.

Read more

The Studio Show Scorecard for Week of November 11-17

PT Rnk

TD Rnk

Nov Distr.
(000)
PT Vwr
(000)
LW/LY TD Vwr
(000)
TD HH TD Vwr
LW/LY

1

=

1

=

97370

3470

-3%

1383

1.0

-4%

=

=

84%

3470

+5%

1383

-3%

+6%

3

+1

2

=

97407

877

+57%

397

0.3

+16%

=

=

84%

877

+99%

397

+15%

+20%

2

=

3

=

72066

959

+1%

264

0.2

-3%

=

=

62%

1296

+12%

357

-4%

+5%

4

-1

4

=

88556

289

-54%

113

0.1

-29%

=

=

76%

318

+29%

125

-39%

-11%

6

+1

5

+2

74882

153

+43%

83

0.0

+17%

-1

=

65%

199

-18%

109

+24%

-7%

5

+1

6

-1

78139

193

+30%

68

0.0

-14%

+3

+2

67%

240

+133%

85

-1%

+58%

8

+1

7

+2

74685

83

-13%

62

0.0

-3%

-1

-1

64%

108

-7%

81

+9%

-23%

9

-1

8

=

81751

76

-28%

60

0.0

-15%

=

+1

71%

91

+12%

72

-26%

+44%

7

-2

9

-3

59078

88

-48%

55

0.0

-25%

-1

-2

51%

145

-25%

90

-25%

-18%

10

=

10

=

70036

36

+33%

22

0.0

+4%

=

=

60%

50

+6%

31

 

-9%

Because I screwed up and forgot how I did week-to-week comparisons for FS1 studio shows last time, and because I have another big game coming up with its own attendant potential effects on FS1 ratings, I’m going to do at least two more Scorecards and do four weeks’ worth of comparisons on the second one. However, the overall averages for FS1 this week remain far enough ahead of any competitors that aren’t ESPN, ESPN2, or NFL Network to be very encouraging.

I’m so late that I’ve integrated the November viewership numbers into the chart above, complete with ESPN2 being in more households than ESPN. I can actually see how some small cable systems might offer ESPN2 to subscribers but not ESPN, but in any case ESPN dismisses this as an anomaly and the result of “a small number of misclassified homes”. I would expect ESPN2 to take a “small” but significant drop in future months if this were fixed, but so far as I can tell SportsBusiness Daily has not published December numbers at all. In any case, ESPN and ESPN2 have been running close enough to neck-in-neck that it doesn’t much matter, and I’m going to keep listing ESPN ahead of ESPN2 in the charts. (ESPNU also seems to have leapfrogged ESPNEWS, but I’m too lazy to reverse their positions on the charts they both appear on, at least this week. Besides, I don’t know if that’ll hold in future months.)

All numbers are in thousands of viewers and are from Son of the Bronx.

Read more

2013 NASCAR Ratings Wrap-Up

Here are the ratings for every NASCAR Sprint Cup race in the 2013 season.

Every race on Fox outrated every race on cable, and only one race on ABC was able to beat any Fox races, even the Sprint Unlimited, the Irwin Tools Night Race from Bristol. As usual, ratings slowly tapered off after the Daytona 500 with the four March races outrating every non-Daytona race.

Other than the Irwin Tools Night Race, the most-watched race not on Fox was the Coke Zero 400 on TNT, followed by the Bank of America 500, the most-watched Chase race, on ABC. ESPN’s most watched race, as usual, was the Brickyard 400, followed by the AdvoCare 500 from Atlanta. The most-watched Chase race on ESPN was the Ford 400, followed by the Camping World RV Sales 500. The Camping World RV Sales 301 was TNT’s most-watched race outside Daytona.

The least-watched Sprint Cup race on broadcast was ABC’s remaining race, the Federated Auto Parts 400 – which still outrated every Chase race on cable. The least-watched race overall was the Geico 400, but due to weather delays that race finished on ESPN2; the portion of the race that aired on ESPN had 3.623 million viewers, which would still make it the only points race with fewer viewers than the Sprint All-Star Race. The next-least viewed race was the Sylvania 300; the least-viewed non-Chase race was the Quaker State 400 on TNT, a race bumped to Sunday by rain, and the least-viewed non-Chase race to run at its normal time was the Cheez-It 355 at the Glen, followed by the Party in the Poconos 400 on TNT. The least-viewed non-Chase race on ESPN not on a road course was the Pure Michigan 400 – which outrated seven of the ten Chase races (and three of TNT’s six races).

Numbers for Sprint Cup races from Jayski.com. 18-49 numbers, when available, from The Futon Critic and TVbytheNumbers.

Read more