The weirdest, wildest, wackiest thing you’ll ever play with!
Sunday Night Football Flex Scheduling Watch: Week 10
NBC’s Sunday Night Football package gives it flexible scheduling. For the last seven weeks of the season, the games are determined on 12-day notice, 6-day notice for Week 17.
The first year, no game was listed in the Sunday Night slot, only a notation that one game could move there. Now, NBC lists the game it “tentatively” schedules for each night. However, the NFL is in charge of moving games to prime time.
Here are the rules from the NFL web site (note that this was written with last season in mind):
- Begins Sunday of Week 11
- In effect during Weeks 11-17
- Only Sunday afternoon games are subject to being moved into the Sunday night window.
- The game that has been tentatively scheduled for Sunday night during flex weeks will be listed at 8:15 p.m. ET. (Note: Last year, NBC listed a tentative game for Week 17; they are not doing so this year.)
- The majority of games on Sundays will be listed at 1:00 p.m. ET during flex weeks except for games played in Pacific or Mountain Time zones which will be listed at 4:05 or 4:15 p.m. ET.
- No impact on Thursday, Saturday or Monday night games.
- The NFL will decide (after consultation with CBS, FOX, NBC) and announce as early as possible the game being played at 8:15 p.m. ET. The announcement will come no later than 12 days prior to the game. The NFL may also announce games moving to 4:05 p.m. ET and 4:15 p.m. ET.
- Week 17 start time changes could be decided on 6 days notice to ensure a game with playoff implications.
- The NBC Sunday night time slot in “flex” weeks will list the game that has been tentatively scheduled for Sunday night. (Note: Again, excluding Week 17.)
- Fans and ticket holders must be aware that NFL games in flex weeks are subject to change 12 days in advance (6 days in Week 17) and should plan accordingly.
- NFL schedules all games.
- Teams will be informed as soon as they are no longer under consideration or eligible for a move to Sunday night.
- Rules NOT listed on NFL web site but pertinent to flex schedule selection: CBS and Fox each protect games in five out of six weeks, and could not protect any games Week 17 last year. Unless I find out otherwise, I’m assuming that’s still the case this year, especially with no tentative game listed Week 17, and that protections were scheduled after Week 4.
- Three teams can appear a maximum of six games in primetime on NBC, ESPN or NFL Network (everyone else gets five) and no team may appear more than four times on NBC. A list of all teams’ number of appearances is in my Week 4 post.
Here are the current tentatively-scheduled games and my predictions:
Week 11 (November 16):
- Selected game: Dallas @ Washington.
Week 12 (November 23):
- Selected game: Indianapolis @ San Diego. Really? 5-4 @ 4-5 is better than 8-1 @ 6-3 or 7-2 @ 6-3? Even if I was wrong about Fox’s protection, both of those games are Fox games so if one was protected, the other was available – and even Eagles-Ravens would have been a better game, at 5-4 @ 6-3! I always figured NBC and the NFL would hold on to the tentative game if circumstances warranted, but either that “tentative bias” is way more powerful than I had suspected, or the NFL looked at the Colts’ winning streak against good teams and the fact that despite a below-.500 record, the Chargers are still only a game back in the AFC West, and decided the game was still worth keeping with all the (diluted) “name” value. Or alternately, NBC and the NFL forgot how to flex a game out. (Or one side wanted to wait until after MNF and the other side thought that wasn’t possible. Or either side was concerned about maxing out Eagles and Giants primetime appearances and Panthers-Falcons was protected.)
Week 13 (November 30):
- Tentative game: Chicago @ Minnesota
- Prospects: Two 5-4 teams tied for the lead in the NFC North. Might be a possibility to keep its spot. The bad news is the Bears didn’t get the job done against the Titans; the good news is they kept it within a score and Kyle Orton expects to be back THIS week.
- Likely protections: Giants-Redskins (Fox) and either Steelers-Patriots or Broncos-Jets (CBS).
- Other possible games: It’s Thanksgiving Weekend, so more teams like the Cowboys and Titans aren’t available. Panthers-Packers is probably out because it’s lopsided and if you want a game with NFC North teams, you keep the all-division battle in the tentative game. On the off chance Steelers-Patriots isn’t protected it certainly looks good, but after this week I’m not sure if being a game better on both sides is enough. Broncos-Jets would be even more vulnerable. Forget about Falcons-Chargers, but Saints-Bucs is really in the same boat.
- Prediction: What a mediocre weekend. If the Bears and Vikings both win they WILL keep their spot. If they both lose, the Steelers and Patriots both win, and their game is unprotected, it’s a fairly good bet to nab the star. The Jets, Chargers, and Saints probably need to win for their respective games to have anything resembling a shot.
Week 14 (December 7):
- Tentative game: New England @ Seattle
- Prospects: The Seahawks are just too terrible for this game to keep its spot.
- Likely protections: Cowboys-Steelers (FOX) and if anything, Jags-Bears (CBS).
- Other possible games: Redskins-Ravens suddenly looks teriffic (though I will consider the prospects of Cowboys-Steelers if Redskins-Ravens had been protected next week), and Eagles-Giants is looking lopsided. Jags-Bears really needs a rally and a Redskins/Ravens collapse, and Falcons-Saints also needs improvement. Titans-Browns could be a masochistic dark horse if the Titans keep winning.
Week 15 (December 14):
- Tentative game: NY Giants @ Dallas
- Prospects: This is why I had Fox protect Bears-Packers Week 11: so they could leave this week protection-free and maximize their chances of getting a marquee NFC East matchup back. And this game might be alive again. A lot depends on what the Cowboys do with Tony Romo back.
- Likely protections: Steelers-Ravens, Broncos-Panthers, Bills-Jets, or nothing (CBS).
- Other possible games: Bucs-Falcons looks great, but they’re running in a dead heat with Steelers-Ravens if that game isn’t protected. Bills-Jets and Broncos-Panthers both trail those two. Vikings-Cardinals looks like a serious contender. Titans-Texans could be a masochistic dark horse if the Titans keep winning.
Week 16 (December 21):
- Tentative game: San Diego @ Tampa Bay
- Prospects: It’s 4-5 @ 6-3. Way too lopsided unless the Chargers can keep recovering.
- Likely protections: Panthers-Giants or Eagles-Redskins (FOX) and Steelers-Titans (CBS).
- Other possible games: Cardinals-Patriots is still strong and Bills-Broncos remains in trouble, but Falcons-Vikings is gaining. If Fox protected Eagles-Redskins all this is moot because the Panthers and Giants would have to collapse to give up the spot, but if it was Panthers-Giants protected the main advantage Eagles-Redskins would have is being a divisional matchup.
Week 17 (December 28 Playoff Positioning Watch):
- Note that not only is there no longer an NBC tentative game, there’s no NFL Network game. Apparently the league learned their lesson from last year’s Patriots-Giants debacle.
- AFC East: Anyone’s game. All four teams within a game of one another. The Pats and Bills play each other, as do the Dolphins and Jets.
- AFC North: Every team is theoretically in it. The Steelers and Ravens are running away with it but are neck-in-neck. The Steelers play the Browns while the Ravens play the Jags.
- AFC South: The Titans are running away with it. No matter the standings, if the Titans remain undefeated Titans-Colts could be a lock. The Texans are mathematically still in it.
- AFC West: Every team is theoretically in it. Broncos and Chargers the main contenders, and play each other. Hmm.
- AFC Wild Card: The losers of the AFC East and North would get the nod if the season ended today. The Dolphins, Bills, and Colts would be a game back, with the Jags and Chargers waiting in the wings, adding luster to both East games, Titans-Colts, Jags-Ravens, and Broncos-Chargers. The AFC has a very attractive line-up.
- NFC East: Every team within three games. Giants and Redskins look strongest. The Giants play the Vikings but the Redskins play the 49ers. The Cowboys and Eagles play each other.
- NFC North: Bears and Vikings lead, Packers a game back. The Bears play the Texans and the Packers play the Lions, but the Vikings play the Giants. The Lions are mathematically still in it.
- NFC South: Every team within three games, with the Panthers leading and the Bucs and Falcons a game behind. The Panthers play the Saints, but Tampa Bay plays the Raiders and the Falcons play the Rams.
- NFC West: Every team mathematically still in it but the Cardinals are running away with it. They play the Seahawks. Hardly must-see TV.
- NFC Wild Card: Any two of the Redskins, Bucs or Falcons would get the nod if the season ended today. Cowboys, Eagles, Bears, and Vikings a game back; Packers and Saints waiting in the wings. Despite all but four teams being within a game of the playoffs, the only real interesting NFC games are Giants-Vikings, Cowboys-Eagles, and Panthers-Saints (and the Saints’ playoff window is narrow to say the least). Those could be competitive games for the NBC pick, especially the first two, but the AFC holds the overall edge right now. The NFL may have done too much to ensure the best game for NBC, creating an overabundance of choices.
New College Football Rankings and Lineal Title Updates
The new college football rankings are up, as are both lineal titles, including an update to my NFL lineal title history, which had never been updated with the Steelers’ lineal title win. More to come.
College Football Schedule: Week 12
Rankings and lineal titles up tomorrow, although the rankings should be apparent from the list below. Once again, apologies for Ball State @ Miami (OH) having started already. All times Eastern.
| Top 25 Games | ||||
| #24 South Carolina | @ | #1 *Florida | 3:30 | CBS |
| #2 Texas | @ | Kansas | 12:30 | FSN |
| #5 USC | @ | Stanford | 7 PM | VS. |
| Indiana | @ | #6 Penn State | Noon | BTN |
| #7 Boise State | @ | Idaho | 5 PM | Gameplan |
| Mississippi State | @ | #8 *Alabama | 7:45 | ESPN |
| #9 Missouri | @ | Iowa State | 6:30 | FSN |
| #10 Ohio State | @ | Illinois | Noon | ESPN |
| #11 Ball State | @ | Miami (OH) | 7 PM TU | ESPN2 |
| #13 North Carolina | @ | Maryland | 3:30 | ABC/ESPN |
| #14 *Utah | @ | San Diego State | 8 PM | mtn. |
| #15 Tulsa | @ | Houston | 8 PM | CBS CS |
| #16 Oklahoma State | @ | Colorado | 8 PM | ABC |
| #17 Georgia | @ | Auburn | 12:30 | R’com/Y’hoo |
| Purdue | @ | #18 Iowa | Noon | BTN |
| #19 BYU | @ | #22 Air Force | 3:30 | CBS CS |
| Boston College | @ | #20 Florida State | 8 PM | ABC |
| Virginia Tech | @ | #23 Miami (FL) | 7:30 TH | ESPN |
| #25 Arizona | @ | Oregon | 6:30 | FSN AZ |
| Watchlist and Other Positive B Point Teams | ||||
| California | @ | Oregon State | 3:30 | ABC |
| This Week’s Other HD Games | ||||
| Central Michigan | @ | Northern Illinois | 8 PM WE | ESPN2 |
| Buffalo | @ | Akron | 7 PM TH | ESPNU |
| Wyoming | @ | UNLV | 9 PM TH | CBS CS |
| Cincinnati | @ | Louisville | 8 PM FR | ESPN2 |
| Notre Dame | @ | Navy | Noon | CBS |
| Northwestern | @ | Michigan | Noon | ESPN2 |
| Duke | @ | Clemson | Noon | Raycom |
| Wake Forest | @ | NC State | 3:30 | ESPNU |
| Connecticut | @ | Syracuse | 7 PM | ESPNU |
| Vanderbilt | @ | Kentucky | 8 PM | ESPN2 |
| UCLA | @ | Washington | 7 PT | FSN |
| Big 12 | ||||
| Nebraska | @ | Kansas State | 3:30 | PPV |
| Texas A&M | @ | Baylor | 4 PM | |
| Big 10 | ||||
| Minnesota | @ | Wisconsin | 3:30 | ABC/ESPN |
| Big East | ||||
| Rutgers | @ | South Florida | Noon | BEN (ESPN+) |
| MAC | ||||
| Temple | @ | Kent State | 8 PM WE | ESPN360 |
| Toledo | @ | Western Michigan | 2 PM | FSN OH/DET |
| MWC | ||||
| New Mexico | @ | Colorado State | 2 PM | mtn. |
| C-USA | ||||
| East Carolina | @ | Southern Miss | 3 PM | |
| UAB | @ | Tulane | 3 PM | CBSCS XXL |
| Central Florida | @ | Marshall | 4:30 | CSS |
| SMU | @ | UTEP | 9 PM | CBSCS XXL |
| WAC | ||||
| Utah State | @ | Louisiana Tech | 2:30 | |
| San Jose State | @ | Nevada | 4 PM | CSD.TV |
| New Mexico State | @ | Fresno State | 5 PM | Gameplan |
| Pac-10 | ||||
| Washington State | @ | Arizona State | 5:30 | |
| Sun Belt | ||||
| Middle Tenn. St. | @ | Western Kentucky | 1 PM | CSS |
| Louisiana-Lafayette | @ | Florida Atlantic | 4 PM | |
| Bowl Subdivision | ||||
| Louisiana-Monroe | @ | Mississippi | 2 PM | |
| Troy | @ | LSU | 8 PM | Gameplan |
Last-Minute Remarks on SNF Week 12 picks
Week 12 (November 23):
- Tentative game: Indianapolis @ San Diego
- Prospects: A 5-4 team against a 4-5 team that just broke a losing streak. With the Colts potentially on the mend, this game might not be completely out of it.
- Likely protections: Eagles-Ravens (Fox) and Jets-Titans (CBS).
- Other possible games mentioned on Wednesday’s Watch and their records: Panthers (7-2)-Falcons (6-3), Giants (8-1)-Cardinals (5-3), Patriots (6-3)-Dolphins (5-4)
- Impact of Monday Night Football: I wouldn’t be surprised if NBC and the NFL are waiting on this game… a Cardinals loss sinks them to four losses and makes the Giants game look potentially lopsided, giving the edge to the Panthers-Falcons divisional matchup, while a win keeps the larger average record alive.
- Analysis: A Cardinals win on Monday night would really help their chances, but the late date of that game means the other games are more important. The Giants beating the Eagles on Sunday night might actualy give NBC and the league pause as the Cardinals game could start looking slightly lopsided, but both teams losing wouldn’t have saved it anyway. However, the game’s in-division importance for the Cardinals should offset that. I had said if the Giants won Giants-Cardinals is probably in, and the Panthers and Falcons would both need to win to force NBC and the NFL to at least consider waiting for Monday Night, but that’s exactly what the Panthers and Falcons did. If NBC was forced to choose before Monday Night, they would probably pick Giants-Cardinals just because the Giants are more recognizible than any of the other three nobodies. Still, Panthers-Falcons is a divisional rivalry…
- Final prediction: New York Giants @ Arizona Cardinals (if the Cardinals win tonight) OR Carolina Panthers @ Atlanta Falcons (if the 49ers win tonight). (And if you’re not watching the game, the latter is very plausible.)
One-seventh of an important notice
At least for next week, and possibly thereafter, I will make every effort to post the Sunday strip by 10 PM PT Saturday.
With how wild the entire neighborhood can get and my current state of mind, it’s either that or wait until late in the night, and I can’t bring myself to sit through my rowdy neighbors’ partying for several hours.
If the prospect of getting away from this neighborhood isn’t motivation enough for me to get some sort of real job by the end of the MONTH, it’s a sign there may not BE a job for me.
Update: Okay, apparently I somehow didin’t update tnew database for yesyerday’s steitag[ pdfgbdl; km;gkcknvmvjkfxcfgnvmkmvcjfm4w,v.mkfjcmx gr jm .blvugr.,b/m sodnsav
Sunday Night Football Flex Scheduling Watch: Week 9
NBC’s Sunday Night Football package gives it flexible scheduling. For the last seven weeks of the season, the games are determined on 12-day notice, 6-day notice for Week 17.
The first year, no game was listed in the Sunday Night slot, only a notation that one game could move there. Now, NBC lists the game it “tentatively” schedules for each night. However, the NFL is in charge of moving games to prime time.
Here are the rules from the NFL web site (note that this was written with last season in mind):
- Begins Sunday of Week 11
- In effect during Weeks 11-17
- Only Sunday afternoon games are subject to being moved into the Sunday night window.
- The game that has been tentatively scheduled for Sunday night during flex weeks will be listed at 8:15 p.m. ET. (Note: Last year, NBC listed a tentative game for Week 17; they are not doing so this year.)
- The majority of games on Sundays will be listed at 1:00 p.m. ET during flex weeks except for games played in Pacific or Mountain Time zones which will be listed at 4:05 or 4:15 p.m. ET.
- No impact on Thursday, Saturday or Monday night games.
- The NFL will decide (after consultation with CBS, FOX, NBC) and announce as early as possible the game being played at 8:15 p.m. ET. The announcement will come no later than 12 days prior to the game. The NFL may also announce games moving to 4:05 p.m. ET and 4:15 p.m. ET.
- Week 17 start time changes could be decided on 6 days notice to ensure a game with playoff implications.
- The NBC Sunday night time slot in “flex” weeks will list the game that has been tentatively scheduled for Sunday night. (Note: Again, excluding Week 17.)
- Fans and ticket holders must be aware that NFL games in flex weeks are subject to change 12 days in advance (6 days in Week 17) and should plan accordingly.
- NFL schedules all games.
- Teams will be informed as soon as they are no longer under consideration or eligible for a move to Sunday night.
- Rules NOT listed on NFL web site but pertinent to flex schedule selection: CBS and Fox each protect games in five out of six weeks, and could not protect any games Week 17 last year. Unless I find out otherwise, I’m assuming that’s still the case this year, especially with no tentative game listed Week 17, and that protections were scheduled after Week 4.
- Three teams can appear a maximum of six games in primetime on NBC, ESPN or NFL Network (everyone else gets five) and no team may appear more than four times on NBC. A list of all teams’ number of appearances is in my Week 4 post.
Here are the current tentatively-scheduled games and my predictions:
Week 11 (November 16):
- Selected game: Dallas @ Washington.
Week 12 (November 23):
- Tentative game: Indianapolis @ San Diego
- Prospects: A .500 team against a 3-5 team on a losing streak. NBC probably didn’t anticipate the decision to flex this game out looking this obvious.
- Likely protections: Eagles-Ravens (Fox) and Jets-Titans (CBS).
- Other possible games: Panthers-Falcons is certainly looking better than Colts-Chargers, and the Falcons have shot up to 9th in NBCSports.com’s Power Rankings. Giants-Cardinals, however, may be stronger overall. Patriots-Dolphins still could be considered in it, but it basically needs the above four teams to all lose.
- Prediction: A Cardinals win on Monday night would really help their chances, but the late date of that game means the other games are more important. The Giants beating the Eagles on Sunday night might actualy give NBC and the league pause as the Cardinals game could start looking slightly lopsided. However, the game’s in-division importance for the Cardinals should offset that. That means the Panthers and the Falcons need to win as well. Basically, if the Giants win Giants-Cardinals is probably in, and the Panthers and Falcons would both need to win to force NBC and the NFL to at least consider waiting for Monday Night. If the Giants lose, and the Panthers and Falcons both win, the Panthers and Falcons take it for sure, and if all three lose it’s Giants-Cardinals, but if the Giants lose and the other two split the pick could depend on a number of factors. If the split is the Falcons winning and the Panthers losing, though, I like Panthers-Falcons’ chances.
Week 13 (November 30):
- Tentative game: Chicago @ Minnesota
- Prospects: 5-3 v. 4-4, Chicago is in the top 10 in NBCSports.com’s latest power rankings, and a big game with big NFC North implications. Could start looking like a possibility to keep its spot, but if the Bears look like they will lose Kyle Orton for a while and look flat against the Titans and Packers it becomes a flex-out risk again.
- Likely protections: Giants-Redskins (Fox) and either Steelers-Patriots or Broncos-Jets (CBS).
- Other possible games: It’s Thanksgiving Weekend, so more teams like the Cowboys and Titans aren’t available. Panthers-Packers might be in trouble. On the off chance Steelers-Patriots isn’t protected it certainly looks good, but could be vulnerable. If it is, Broncos-Jets is no longer much of a draw. Falcons-Chargers is probably out. Saints-Bucs has probably passed it.
Week 14 (December 7):
- Tentative game: New England @ Seattle
- Prospects: The Seahawks are just too terrible for this game to keep its spot.
- Likely protections: Cowboys-Steelers (FOX) and if anything, Jags-Bears (CBS).
- Other possible games: Redskins-Ravens has a chance to still be alive, so the Eagles and Giants shouldn’t change those tickets yet. Jags-Bears is a very dark horse if it’s unprotected, but Falcons-Saints is probably stronger.
Week 15 (December 14):
- Tentative game: NY Giants @ Dallas
- Prospects: This is why I had Fox protect Bears-Packers Week 11: so they could leave this week protection-free and maximize their chances of getting a marquee NFC East matchup back. And this game might be alive again. A lot depends on what the Cowboys do with Tony Romo back.
- Likely protections: Steelers-Ravens, Broncos-Panthers, Bills-Jets, or nothing (CBS).
- Other possible games: Packers-Jaguars might be out, but Bucs-Falcons is improving. Steelers-Ravens is the best of the potentially protected games, while Broncos-Panthers may have dodged a huge bullet Thursday night. If things break right, Vikings-Cardinals is a dark horse.
Week 16 (December 21):
- Tentative game: San Diego @ Tampa Bay
- Prospects: It’s 3-5 @ 6-3, and the Chargers are fading fast. Way too lopsided.
- Likely protections: Panthers-Giants or Eagles-Redskins (FOX) and Steelers-Titans (CBS).
- Other possible games: Cardinals-Patriots is still strong, but Falcons-Vikings and Bills-Broncos are both fading (although nothing bad happened to the former this week), so the only thing stopping Cardinals-Pats could be the game Fox didn’t protect. And if the unprotected game is Eagles-Redskins, Cardinals-Pats is still very much alive.
Week 17 (December 28):
- Playoff positioning watch begins next week, like last year, because of all my playing catch-up. But NEXT year, I swear, I will make good on my original promises! 😀
Sports Watcher for the Weekend of 11/8-9
I think I need to take another break from the Watcher in a few weeks. All times PST.
Saturday
9-12:30 PM: College football, #20 Georgia Tech @ #16 North Carolina (Raycom Sports). Wait, why didn’t ABC pick this up for their ACC package? Clemson-Florida State? The Bowden Bowl is less than pointless this year!
12:30-4 PM: College football, #2 Penn State @ #19 Iowa (ABC/ESPN). There are no fewer than six games between two teams ranked in my Top 25 this week!
4-7:30 PM: College football, Kansas State @ #7 Missouri (FSN). The item below bumps out the latest Big 12 Battle of the Century.
7:30-9:30 PM: MLS Soccer, Real Salt Lake @ Chivas USA (Fox Soccer Channel). Didn’t we just do this last week? Who cares about a team with a name like Real Salt Lake?
Sunday
10-12:30 PM: NBA Basketball, Raptors @ Bobcats (CBC). Wait, the Raptors are on a national network that penetrates into parts of the United States???
12-4 PM: NASCAR Sprint Cup Racing, Checker O’Reilly Auto Parts 500 presented by Pennzoil (ABC). Judging by the ads, the Chase is actually getting interesting???
Honorable Mention: 1-3 PM: PBR Rodeo, Built Ford Tough World Finals (NBC). Thank God for NASCAR bumping this bleep off the Watcher.
5-8:30 PM: NFL Football, Giants @ Eagles (NBC). Flex Scheduling Watch is probably coming later tonight, folks.
College Football Schedule: Week 11
Includes final scores from games already completed. All times Eastern.
| Top 25 Games | ||||
| #1 *Florida | @ | #23 Vanderbilt | 8 PM | ESPN2 |
| #2 Penn State | @ | #19 Iowa | 3:30 | ABC/ESPN Only ABC HD |
| Baylor | @ | #3 Texas | Noon | FSN |
| #4 Oklahoma | @ | Texas A&M | 3:30 | ABC |
| California | @ | #5 USC | 8 PM | ABC |
| #10 Oklahoma State | @ | #6 *Texas Tech | 8 PM | ABC |
| #7 *Alabama | @ | LSU | 3:30 | CBS |
| Utah State | @ | #8 Boise State | 2 PM | KTVB/KJZZ/ ESPN360 |
| #9 TCU | 10-13 | #12 *Utah | Final TH | CBS CS |
| Kansas State | @ | #11 Missouri | 7 PM | FSN |
| Northern Illinois | 14-45 | #13 Ball State | Final WE | ESPN2 |
| #15 Ohio State | @ | #24 Northwestern | Noon | ESPN2 |
| #20 Georgia Tech | @ | #16 North Carolina | Noon | Raycom |
| #17 Georgia | @ | Kentucky | 12:30 | Raycom |
| San Diego State | @ | #18 BYU | 2 PM | mtn. |
| Michigan | @ | #21 Minnesota | Noon | ESPN |
| Cincinnati | @ | #22 West Virginia | 7 PM | ESPNU |
| #25 Kansas | @ | Nebraska | 2:30 | PPV |
| Watchlist and Other Positive B Point Teams | ||||
| Clemson | @ | Florida State | 3:30 | ABC/ESPN |
| Arizona | @ | Washington State | 5 PM | |
| Colorado State | @ | Air Force | 6 PM | mtn. |
| Nevada | @ | Fresno State | 9 PM FR | ESPN |
| Oregon State | @ | UCLA | 6 PM | FSN/FCS |
| This Week’s Other HD Games | ||||
| Miami (OH) | 17-37 | Buffalo | Final TU | ESPN2 |
| Maryland | 13-23 | Virginia Tech | Final TH | ESPN |
| Purdue | @ | Michigan State | Noon | BTN |
| Syracuse | @ | Rutgers | Noon | ESPNU |
| Wisconsin | @ | Indiana | Noon | BTN |
| Stanford | @ | Oregon | 3:30 | FSN |
| Virginia | @ | Wake Forest | 3:30 | ESPNU |
| Notre Dame | @ | Boston College | 8 PM | ESPN |
| SEC | ||||
| Wyoming | @ | Tennessee | 1 PM | Gameplan |
| Arkansas | @ | South Carolina | 1 PM | Gameplan |
| Tennessee-Martin | @ | Auburn | 2:30 | |
| Big 12 | ||||
| Iowa State | @ | Colorado | 1:30 | VS. |
| ACC | ||||
| NC State | @ | Duke | 3:30 | ESPN360 |
| Big East | ||||
| Louisville | @ | Pittsburgh | Noon | BEN (ESPN+) |
| MAC | ||||
| Toledo | 30-47 | Akron | Final WE | ESPNU |
| Bowling Green | @ | Ohio | 2 PM | CSD.TV |
| MWC | ||||
| New Mexico | @ | UNLV | 7 PT | mtn. |
| C-USA | ||||
| Memphis | @ | SMU | 3 PM | CBSCS XXL |
| Marshall | @ | East Carolina | 3:30 | CBS CS |
| Southern Miss | @ | Central Florida | 3:30 | CBSCS XXL |
| Tulane | @ | Houston | 8 PM | CBS CS |
| Pac-10 | ||||
| Arizona State | @ | Washington | 7 PM | FSN/FCS |
| WAC | ||||
| Hawaii | @ | New Mexico State | 4 PM | Gameplan |
| Louisiana Tech | @ | San Jose State | 8 PM | CSD.TV |
| Sun Belt | ||||
| Western Kentucky | @ | Troy | 3:30 | CSS |
| Louisiana-Monroe | @ | Middle Tenn. St. | 3:30 | |
| North Texas | @ | Florida Atlantic | 4 PM | |
| Arkansas State | @ | Florida International | 7 PM | |
| Bowl Subdivision | ||||
| Illinois | v. | Western Michigan | Noon | ESPN+ |
| Army | @ | Rice | 3 PM | CBSCS XXL |
| UTEP | @ | Louisiana-Lafayette | 7 PM | ESPN+ |
College Football Rankings after Week 10, plus musings on Barack Obama that’s not related to his win
Okay, I tried to write this as though we hadn’t already gone through two days and change of games already this week. Ball State has already played, which sucks as I had to carefully word its entry so as not to seem like an idiot while still plausibly coming from before its game. It didn’t help that I forgot my laptop’s power cord and had to waste two hours to go back home and get it. It would have saved me more than an hour and a half and I could have had the rankings up much earlier, and would be less under the gun for the schedule. Sadly, the SNF Flex Scheduling Watch not only may have to wait until Friday, but take into account Thursday night results as well.
Did you hear? Barack Obama supports a college football playoff! He wants to “get…the top eight teams right at the end. You got a playoff. Decide on a national champion.” Obviously this rolls right into my wheelhouse, and it gives me a chance to survey the landscape for my college football playoff proposal.
(How about McCain and his call to root out steroids? When you think about it, a playoff is a bit frivolous for Obama to be advocating; McCain talked about a more serious issue that can be life or death. It’s something that actually would be plausible for him to do as president, rather than get ridiculed by everyone outside sports, if Obama even had the power to do it at all. I read one comment that said “McCain wants make [sic] things back to the way they used to be. Obama is looking fix [sic] a broken system by making change.” Um… are you saying you think the proliferation of steroids is just “the way things are” now?)
Barack. I love ya. I voted for ya. I completely agree on the need for a playoff. But you’re not ambitious enough, man!
This happens every year at this time: wannabe playoff pushers ruin the good name of the playoff idea by proposing playoff schemes that’s whatever would be the ideal scheme for that particular year with a minimum of teams (to Protect the Sanctity of the Regular Season(tm)). Last year the big proposal was an eight-team playoff with automatic bids for the BCS conference champions. At least one place proposed also including an automatic bid for the best non-BCS conference team, leaving only one at-large. That would have worked last year, when there were only one or two non-conference champions with a claim at the BCS (Kansas and Georgia) and an undefeated non-BCS conference team (Hawaii).
It would be an unmitigated disaster this year. The Big 12 South is a clusterbleep, and leaving an odd team out between Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State would be rather inherently unfair, especially if everyone in that division has at least two losses. That would get amplified if you threw in the SEC Title Game loser or kept the non-BCS automatic qualifier. And if you junked the latter, what happens to what could still be as many as three undefeated non-BCS conference teams? And what about USC, which would get screwed if Oregon State wins out? And all this to keep the conference champions of the crummy ACC and Big East (highest-ranked teams in the BCS #19 and #25 respectively, and not much higher in my rankings)?
So now the big proposal is throwing in just the top eight teams regardless of conference affiliations, which might be unfair to leagues with a lot of parity, not to mention non-BCS schools that never really get that high. As Jay Mariotti said recently on Around the Horn (paraphrased), “this would be a good year for a playoff because we have eight championship-caliber teams”. Am I the only one who thinks that would make an eight-team playoff a bad idea? If the top eight teams are bunched up at the top, they have basically zero motivation to play for seeding, only to get into the tournament! It’s the same no matter where they’re seeded or who they play, so why bother?
As it turns out, at least this year, more really is more.
The 16-team system that has been gaining a lot of traction – all 11 conference champions, plus 5 at larges – is one system that would have worked last year and this year. Five at-larges was more than enough for everybody; Kansas and Georgia were both rewarded for their strong seasons with at-large berths in my simulated playoffs. (Five may in fact have been too many, as Florida and Boston College both got in, but as both were seeded ahead of teams that were seriously considered for the real-life title game it may have been deserved.) Missouri and West Virginia, after last-day upsets, were forced to go on the road in the first round against real-life championship contenders (but at least Missouri got in after their two losses both came to Oklahoma). 3-loss Virginia Tech was my 1 seed on the basis of their schedule; Arizona State, Cincinnati, and Texas had 3 losses but didn’t get in at all. (And remember, only two teams – Kansas and Hawaii – had one loss or fewer.)
This year? I’d like to point any doubters to my case for a playoff – my system specifically – from the leadup to last year’s simulation.
Why, the 8-team proponents say, should I award spots in the tournament to every mid-major conference champion? No way are they better than potential at-large teams that would make for a true top 16. But this is actually a strength. Sure, the MAC, C-USA, and Sun Belt champions might not be real threats to win the national championship. But you can’t tell me it’s not incredibly valuable to pick up a top 3 seed and, basically, a free pass to the second round. The four seed, on the other hand, might be at risk of an upset against one of the better mid-major champions, or if it’s a really strong year for mid-majors, an at-large. The five and six seeds get stuck with either the lower-rated at-larges or the “BCS Buster” du jour.
There’s still a lot for the eight top teams to play for:
- “The MAC, C-USA, and Sun Belt champions might not be real threats to win the national championship”? Not anymore! Before last week the Sun Belt was the only non-BCS conference without an undefeated team! Even now facing any conference champion from any conference that’s not the Sun Belt brings the very real possibility of an upset of Appalachian State-esque proportions! Suddenly there’s a huge incentive for one of the top teams to strive for a 1 seed; anything less would be risking an upset, but with a 1 seed you can rest your starters and coast. (If Conference USA is not a factor anymore, we can extend that privlege to the 2 seed, releasing some pressure to be #1, but that’s the same as the BCS we have now anyway.) If we went by the BCS standings a BCS conference champion could be seeded as low as 14, meaning even a 3 seed might have to contend with a BCS team!
- After getting someone to pound on in the first round, the 1 seed will be tanned, rested and ready for the next round. You want to avoid the 8 seed so you’re not risking having to face a far more rested team in the second round! If we extend the above privlege to the 2 seed, the 7 seed becomes off-limits as well!
- Not to mention, if the BCS standings are any indication, if you sink too close to the 8 you risk the Mountain West champion (maybe even Boise State) bumping you down a spot – possibly all the way to 9 and a first-round road game! If we went by the BCS standings the top 11 teams would all get in right now (assuming Oregon State loses), meaning a seed as high as 6 puts you up against a legit national championship contender!
- Depending on how we set up the details, we haven’t even mentioned the importance of getting a seed of 4 or higher for a second-round home game!
The Big 12’s Big 4 would all be jockeying for position, knowing they could get a Troy in the first round and a second-round home game, or they could get a Ball State or North Carolina or West Virginia or even an Ohio State or Oregon State, with a second-round road game against the first type of team looming. Oklahoma State doesn’t want people saying they could get a 9 seed; they want to knock off Texas Tech this weekend and get a game in front of their home fans, while Texas Tech doesn’t want to give the pollsters or committee an excuse to dump them from the top few seeds to the middle or even bottom few seeds, taking them from a relatively easy first round opponent to a team that could win it all if you don’t handle them now.
There’s a possibility that an Alabama-Florida SEC title game would be a coastfest for both teams under a playoff, but with the winner almost guaranteed a top three seed and the loser probably condemned to a 5 or worse (6 or worse for Florida), there’s still quite a bit to play for. Penn State doesn’t want to lose another game, because they’re probably getting a top three seed right now. Sure, it might be cold comfort to have a small number next to your name if you’re playing Tulsa or West Virginia, but look on the bright side: they wouldn’t be sinking so low as to be staring at Ohio State, Ball State, or even Boise State, not to mention the possible second-round home game.
It’s not perfect. Maybe I could reduce the field a little. But it provides meaningful incentives to increase your standing within the playoff, which is more than can be said for most smaller systems. I guess this is one place where I ever-so-slightly disagree with the new President-Elect of the United States. (Well, aside from some places in my platform examination.)
To learn more about my system and the criteria for my simulation of it later, click here.