How Might the Integration of CBS Sports and TNT Sports Play Out?

Well sports fans, you got your wish. Are you happy now?

Back in the early-to-mid 2010s, when the cable bundle still seemed to rule the world of entertainment, and particularly in the immediate aftermath of CBS and the outfit then known as Turner Sports teaming up to retain the former’s rights to the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, a number of sports-focused media watchers wondered about the possibility of CBS and Turner’s then-owner, Time Warner, merging. From a sports perspective, it seemed to make sense: while Disney, Comcast, and Fox all had both broadcast and cable outlets to air sports, CBS had a broadcast network but its only suitable cable outlet was the poorly-distributed CBS Sports Network, while Turner had perhaps the best non-ESPN collection of sports rights on cable, but no broadcast network. I felt this was a simplistic, myopic analysis that didn’t take into account the whole picture of how well the two companies might fit together – most obviously, Time Warner-owned HBO and CBS-owned Showtime were the top two names in premium television networks, plus you’d have the separate news operations of CBS and CNN – and that became even more so when CBS re-merged with Viacom and picked up a real base of cable networks again, including Nickelodeon which has a long-standing competition with Warner-owned Cartoon Network, as well as reuniting with the Paramount movie studio, one of several major studios alongside Warner Bros. I actually thought Fox’s brief dalliance with buying Time Warner made more sense, even from a sports perspective.

Well, last week, the merger of the two companies closed, with the merged company having no trace of either company in its name, operating under the Skydance name inherited from the media company David Ellison originally picked up before buying first Paramount and now Warner Bros. Discovery. In most corners of the Internet, the reaction has generally been a sense of dread, partly over the prospect of lost jobs and draconian cost-cutting to pay down the massive debt the Ellison family has racked up in these transactions (not to mention the debt inherited from WBD), but also what some fear is the real purpose of the transaction: turning CNN into right-wing propaganda, once Bari Weiss, the person Ellison installed as head of CBS News who promptly pushed the division into being more conservative-friendly and less critical of Trump, gets her hands on it. Certainly Paramount Skydance was the only company interested in keeping WBD’s cable networks in the fold; WBD planned to split into separate companies for its studios and networks before Ellison began his hostile takeover attempt, and when WBD courted Netflix as an alternative, that transaction would have involved only the studios portion of the split. What might once have been one of the biggest stumbling blocks to a CBS-Warner merger, negotiating the potential merger of CBS News and CNN and the potential regulatory hurdles presented by it, not only wasn’t a problem for the Trump FCC and DOJ, but the whole reason why it happened.

Read more

Memo to the NFL: Don’t Foster Pick-Tipping By Slowing Down the NFL Draft

After a long period of scuttlebutt that the NFL would move the draft to a streaming service, last year we started to get clarity about the future of the draft. First, the Athletic‘s Andrew Marchand confirmed previous reporting that ESPN would retain rights to the draft and share them with a “digital player”, predicting that “you will see two places have the draft in the future”. Of course, right now the draft airs in at least two places, ESPN and NFL Network, but ESPN and the league have engaged in renewed talks for ESPN to acquire NFL Media which would put both networks under one roof. Still, this might seem to suggest that NFL Network’s separate broadcast of the draft might not be long for this world… until Front Office Sports reported the following day that NFLN was, in fact, expected to retain the rights to the NFL Draft beyond this year, while YouTube was in “pole position” to land international distribution rights to the draft.

It’s not clear whether YouTube would be able to distribute its draft broadcast in the United States, though there are enough places for people to catch the draft as it stands that, on the surface, one more wouldn’t hurt. What is clear is that, in all likelihood, YouTube won’t merely be redistributing the ESPN or NFL Network coverage but producing its own oriented towards an international audience that may not be familiar with American football, or at the least college football. That would make it a fourth official draft broadcast to join the traditional broadcasts on ESPN and NFL Network as well as the more human-interest-focused coverage on ABC.

Read more

Last-Minute Remarks on NFL Flexible Scheduling Decisions Following Week 15

Week 16: No announcement was made on the Week 16 slate on Sunday, which is a change from past “six-day hold” situations. This sort of limbo can end up getting the 506sports Discord stir-crazy and wondering if Fox held the line enough on keeping Vikings-Seahawks to force CBS to stick with Niners-Dolphins as its lead game, but the most likely explanations are a) continued horse-trading involving what sort of compensation to give Fox and b) holding off so the league can make announcements for Weeks 16 and 17 at once. We saw with the Thursday night flex that the league can make a decision regarding a flex before they actually announce it. It’s worth noting that NBC advertised the Bucs-Cowboys game for Sunday night during last night’s game, after CBS and Fox did not advertise their slates for next Sunday at all – and it’s also worth noting that on-screen, though not verbal, advertisements for Bucs-Cowboys started showing up at halftime but were absent from NBC’s ticker during pregame, which may suggest NBC was informed that they would be keeping the game sometime during the first half. To my knowledge, however, as I write this nothing has leaked regarding any time or network changes.

Right now the playoff hopes of both the Niners and Dolphins are hanging by a thread, although the Chargers’ loss means that both a Chargers win and Dolphins loss would be needed to eliminate the Dolphins. If I were the czar of the NFL schedule I’d move Niners-Dolphins to the 1 PM ET window so the Rams can’t eliminate the Niners before game time; moving Rams-Jets late only dilutes the distribution of Niners-Dolphins, as it likely can’t move to the same network as Giants-Falcons. But moving any game other than Niners-Dolphins or Eagles-Swing States to 4:05 means moving a game involving a team already eliminated from the playoffs, and the next-best game on the Sunday afternoon slate, Lions-Bears, sees the Bears enforcing a blackout on CBS in the Chicago market, so moving it late means depriving the market from the feature game. Jaguars-Raiders, the only other 4:25 PM ET game, might be the worst game of the entire season, let alone the week’s slate, so it’s not a good choice to move to Fox either. Given that, and given the time constraints if the schedule hasn’t already been finalized without our knowledge, a straight swap of Niners-Dolphins for Vikings-Seahawks seems most likely. (Hey, maybe in light of the Geno Smith injury, there’s a last-minute push to get Fox to give up Eagles-Swing States instead! Eh, probably not.) Final prediction: Minnesota Vikings @ Seattle Seahawks to 4:25 CBS.

Week 17 thoughts after the jump!

Read more