Because I’m a bit under the weather with a cold, the release of the Week 3 Consensus Power Rankings and my Week 4 picks are delayed until tomorrow morning.
Sports
Sunday Night Football Flex Scheduling Watch: Week 3
NBC’s Sunday Night Football package gives it flexible scheduling. For the last seven weeks of the season, the games are determined on 12-day notice, 6-day notice for Week 17.
Last year, no game was listed in the Sunday Night slot, only a notation that one game could move there. CBS and Fox were able to protect one game every week each but had to leave one week each unprotected and had to submit their protections after only four weeks.
Now, NBC lists the game it “tentatively” schedules for each night, and by all appearances, CBS and Fox can’t protect anything. However, the NFL is in charge of moving games to prime time.
Here are the rules from the NFL web site:
- Begins Sunday of Week 11
- In effect during Weeks 11-17
- Only Sunday afternoon games are subject to being moved into the Sunday night window.
- The game that has been tentatively scheduled for Sunday night during flex weeks will be listed at 8:15 p.m. ET.
- The majority of games on Sundays will be listed at 1:00 p.m. ET during flex weeks except for games played in Pacific or Mountain Time zones which will be listed at 4:05 or 4:15 p.m. ET.
- No impact on Thursday, Saturday or Monday night games.
- The NFL will decide (after consultation with CBS, FOX, NBC) and announce as early as possible the game being played at 8:15 p.m. ET. The announcement will come no later than 12 days prior to the game. The NFL may also announce games moving to 4:05 p.m. ET and 4:15 p.m. ET.
- Week 17 start time changes could be decided on 6 days notice to ensure a game with playoff implications.
- The NBC Sunday night time slot in “flex” weeks will list the game that has been tentatively scheduled for Sunday night.
- Fans and ticket holders must be aware that NFL games in flex weeks are subject to change 12 days in advance (6 days in Week 17) and should plan accordingly.
- NFL schedules all games.
- Teams will be informed as soon as they are no longer under consideration or eligible for a move to Sunday night.
Here are the current tentatively-scheduled games and my predictions:
Week 11 (November 18):
- Tentative game: Chicago @ Seattle
- Prospects: Cloudy, but looking promising. Seattle is off to a decent start but Chicago could start stinking up the joint.
- Other possible games: Redskins @ Cowboys; Panthers @ Packers. That the NFL’s biggest rivalry did not merit a preliminary pick on Sunday night does not bode well; however, either could prove a very, very significant matchup.
Week 12 (November 25):
- Tentative game: Philadelphia @ New England
- Prospects: Potentially appealing. It all depends on whether the Eagles continue in the mold of their recent win or their first two losses.
- Other possible games: All the other teams in NBCSports.com’s top five in the power rankings have other commitments on Thanksgiving or Monday night. Ravens-Chargers, Broncos-Bears, and the dark horse in Bucs-Redskins could all be spoilers, but look for this to stay a McNabb-Brady matchup.
Week 13 (December 2):
- Tentative game: Cincinnati @ Pittsburgh
- Prospects: Downright mixed. The Steelers have started promisingly, but the Bengals have struggled enough coming out of the gate that this could look very lopsided.
- Other possible games: Jaguars-Colts, Seahawks-Eagles, and a true dark horse: Texans-Titans.
Week 14 (December 9):
- Tentative game: Indianapolis @ Baltimore
- Prospects: Very good, with both teams out to hot starts. However, the Ravens aren’t quite Super Bowl contenders, so Steelers-Patriots could well pull the upset.
Week 15 (December 16):
- Tentative game: Washington @ NY Giants
- Prospects: Bad. The Giants need to pick up quickly to avoid being flexed out.
- Other possible games: Jaguars-Steelers and Seahawks-Panthers are dark horses, but look for Eagles-Cowboys to be flexed into this spot.
Week 16 (December 23):
- Tentative game: Tampa Bay @ San Francisco
- Prospects: Could be better than might have been thought before the season. However, it is a 9-vs.-16 matchup in the NBC Sports Power Rankings.
- Other possible games: Texans-Colts, Packers-Bears, Ravens-Seahawks – with Jets-Titans a potential dark horse.
Week 17 (December 30):
- Tentative game: Kansas City @ NY Jets
- Prospects: Horrid. Two 1-2 teams? They need to get better fast.
- Other possible games: Steelers-Ravens, Titans-Colts, Cowboys-Redskins, Panthers-Bucs, with Packers-Lions a dark horse. Playoff positioning watch begins after Week 9.
Week 4 College Football Rankings
Only one sport could inspire ESPN to run a 25-hour pregame show leading up to their first game of the new season: college football! After four wild and wacky weeks, we’re ready for the new C Ratings. In a last minute change, I decided that OT games ould be considered to have an MoV of 0. That means they only affect the winning percentage component of A Rating while averaging a 0, which translates to a .5, on the score ratio component. They also give B Points similar to a I-AA game: only the home field modifier regardless of outcome. As exciting as college football OT is, it’s a joke and has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual play of the game. It’s more of a skills competition, akin to penalty kicks in soccer. If drives occurred the way they do in actual play, as opposed to starting within field goal range, I might give it more weight.
As always, the first few weeks are still rather volatile, but still instructive. Impressively, LSU led the C Ratings after a masterful Week 1 performance over Mississippi State and have never looked back, up by nearly 5000. Florida, bolstered by my decision to include Western Kentucky as a I-A team despite a mostly I-AA schedule, is making the coming 1-2 showdown a can’t miss bout. USC looked like a preseason favorite after demolishing Michigan in the Rose Bowl and adding perhaps the best recruiting class in the nation, but they might not be the best team in their own conference. Oregon has looked unstoppable thus far. To think the ESPN family won’t have any Pac-10 action on October 27th, when these two square off on FSN. Oklahoma and Ohio State might also be contenders to go to New Orleans. It looks like it’ll be a long season in South Bend: the Golden Domers are in dead last and could stay there the rest of the way.
How the C Ratings are tabulated: First, A Ratings are tabulated by multiplying the total score ratio, which is expressed by (points-opponents’ points)/points, by the winning percentage. Score ratio minimizes the effect of running up the score. Next, B Points for each game are tabulated by (margin of victory)/(opponent’s A rating)+/-1 for wins, and -(margin of loss)/(1-opponent’s A Rating)+/-1 for losses. The “+/-” is + for road games and – for home ones. The total number of B Points is multiplied by the A Rating to get the B Rating. Conference Ratings are tabulated by averaging the B Ratings of all teams in the conference. (Independents are counted separately, and Army and Navy are counted as one conference.) Finally, the C Rating is tabulated by taking the difference between the team’s B Rating and his conference’s rating, taking a fraction of that equal to the fraction of Division I-A the conference makes up, and taking the result off the B Rating. The three ratings go A, B, C across.
| 1. | LSU (4-0) SEC Leader 2004 Auburn Title |
.910 | 17806.865 | 16270.763 |
With 7 teams in positive B Points in the SEC, if LSU can run the table, they better be No. 1 in the polls as well. |
| 2. | Florida (4-0) Princeton Title |
.784 | 13043.663 | 11983.881 |
The LSU-Florida game in two weeks could be the game of the year. |
| 3. | Oklahoma (4-0) Big 12 Leader |
.903 | 12500.041 | 11273.782 |
If USC falters, look for the Sooners to take advantage and run for the National Championship. |
| 4. | Oregon Pac-10 Leader |
.786 | 9597.666 | 8773.179 |
Huh? What are the Ducks doing here? They’ve never scored less than 30, only this week gave up more than 30, and never won by less than 20. If they stay unbeaten until USC at home and win there… |
| 5. | Ohio State (4-0) Big 10 Leader 2007 Boise State Title |
.900 | 8432.105 | 7720.991 |
The Buckeyes might be able to run the table if the Big 10 is as down a conference as people have started to think. |
| 6. | USC (3-0) | .801 | 6307.529 | 5757.221 |
USC’s problem is twofold: two of its games were against mediocre opposition at best and they let Nebraska get garbage time scores. But more to the point? One fewer game than everyone else. |
| 7. | Kentucky (4-0) | .738 | 4274.008 | 4091.191 |
WTF? Never scored less than 40, never given up more than 35, and delivered a solid defeat to a decent Arkansas team. But the meat of the SEC is still to come. |
| 8. | West Virginia (4-0) Big East Leader |
.817 | 4422.667 | 4050.259 |
After a strong year, the Big East appears to once again be out of the top four BCS conferences. That just means a dominant-looking West Virginia could be unstoppable. |
| 9. | Cincinnati (4-0) | .912 | 4187.525 | 3830.794 |
Huh? Scored less than 40 only once, never given up more than 14, beat a decent Oregon State team. They don’t want to just be spoilers this year. |
| 10. | Connecticut (4-0) | .813 | 3682.775 | 3359.694 |
What on earth is UConn doing at 4-0? Crushing a still-good Pitt team by 20 shows they’re for real. They might not drop for a while with Cincy and WV not on the schedule until November. |
| 11. | Hawaii (4-0) Non-BCS Leader |
.808 | 4147.456 | 3328.240 |
With the early favorites to be BCS busters struggling early, it looks like Hawaii is the major hope to crash the party—even if they did have to squeeze a victory over Louisiana Tech. |
| 12. | Arizona State (4-0) | .800 | 3178.150 | 2888.623 |
The Sun Devils, constantly on the verge of becoming a Pac-10 power, have looked impressive early on. But the real test comes October 27, when Cal comes to town. |
| 13. | Michigan State (4-0) | .731 | 2975.847 | 2764.890 |
The yearly heartbreak hasn’t started yet, and the weak Irish didn’t do anything to change that. But Wisconsin this week is the strongest team yet. |
| 14. | Boston College (4-0) ACC Leader |
.741 | 2910.481 | 2491.885 |
Their next three look to continue the Eagles’ winning ways, but their hopes at the ACC Title Game will be decided when they return to ACC play against V-Tech, FSU, Clemson, and Miami. |
| 15. | California (4-0) | .700 | 2683.787 | 2435.457 |
Weak opposition largely to blame for the low rating. But they have a shot to establish their bona fides this week against Oregon. |
| 16. | Missouri (4-0) | .698 | 2360.806 | 2148.470 |
They’ve faced nothing but weak opposition so far, but right now they look like the power team in the Big 12 North. |
| 17. | Texas (4-0) | .730 | 2318.474 | 2110.372 |
The tight win over UCF is really hurting their ranking, but it looks like it’s going to be a nice year for Colt McCoy and the Longhorns. |
| 18. | Purdue (4-0) | .781 | 2254.127 | 2109.328 |
Only cupcakes so far, but never scored less than 45. Look for the run to end October 6 against Ohio State. |
| 19. | Wisconsin (4-0) | .675 | 2210.044 | 2069.285 |
The Badgers might be a paper tiger, but unbeaten is unbeaten. We’ll see how strong they really are against Michigan State this week. |
| 20. | Rutgers (3-0) | .889 | 2273.483 | 2044.354 |
Demolished their first three opponents quite handily to pick up where they left off last year. Of course, Navy was the only decent team of the bunch, and one was I-AA; Maryland and Cincy should bulk up the resume. |
| 21. | Illinois (3-1) | .548 | 1891.864 | 1780.272 |
Huh? Lost to a good Missouri team by only 6; then turned around and crushed a decent Indiana team. They can prove their worth to the nation this week against Penn State. |
| 22. | Texas Tech (3-1) | .529 | 1476.398 | 1352.503 |
Keep in mind, the tight loss to Oklahoma State<> |
| 23. | Alabama (3-1) | .519 | 1153.694 | 1282.909 |
OT loss to Georgia aside, the Crimson Tide looked dominant to start the season. Like Texas Tech, they’ll probably fall off, but they could be spoilers to LSU on November 3rd. |
| 24. | Kansas (4-0) | .940 | 1143.437 | 1052.838 |
Huh? Weak opposition inflates their A Rating—Toledo was the only team to score double digits against them, while KU has never scored less than 45. Could they be Big 12 North contenders? |
| 25. | Clemson (4-0) | .748 | 1288.787 | 1032.361 |
Except FSU, Clemson has faced only weak opposition, deflating their rating. But the meat of the ACC is still to come. |
37 teams total with positive C rating (none with negative B rating)
2004 Utah Title: #72 UNLV (2-2), .265, -2895.404, -2909.816
Watch List: #26 Auburn, #27 South Florida (UB), #28 Georgia, #29 South Carolina, #30 TCU, #31 Florida State
Other Positive B Ratings: #32 Mississippi State, #33 Miami, #34 Nebraska, #35 Iowa, #36 Virginia Tech, #37 Wyoming, #38 Central Florida, #39 New Mexico, #41 BYU, #42 Ball State (UB=Unbeaten not on top 25)
Bottom 10: #111 Louisiana-Lafayette, #112 Miami (OH), #113 Louisiana-Monroe, #114 SMU, #115 Rice, #116 San Jose State, #117 Florida International, #118 Temple, #119 Syracuse, #120 Notre Dame
Conference Rating: #1 SEC (2445.843), #2 Big 10 (674.497), #3 Big 12 (237.446), #4 Pac-10 (-296.172), #5 Big East (-1163.446), #6 ACC (-1275.477), #7 Mountain West (-3087.562, leader #30 TCU), #8 WAC (-6775.428), #9 MAC (-7014.195, leader #42 Ball State), #10 C-USA (-7132.373, leader #51 Houston), #11 Sun Belt (-11418.525, leader #90 Troy)
Complete list of teams still to come!
Enter NBC Sports, Exit Yahoo Sports?
NBCSports.com finally joined the power ranking party, so I will be kicking out the MSNBC/ColdHardFootballFacts.com rankings when I release the new SuperPower Rankings tomorrow.
I’m tempted to kick out the Yahoo rankings as well… on the one hand, they’re a duo of rankings, and I have a policy of always having an odd number of rankings, to minimize ties. Their duplicity was the sole reason I included the MSNBC rankings in the first place; the addition of NBCSports.com rankings renders them downright superfluous. On the other, I did include the Yahoo rankings for the first few weeks; to get rid of them would quite possibly reduce the reliability of the whole rankings. And they are among the 8 major multi-sports web sites, and according to Alexa rankings, among the top 5 among those 8, unlike upstart NBCSports.com.
Only one way for me to be sure: a new Da Blog Poll! Scroll down to the new poll and let your voice be heard for the next week. (Unless I get a flurry of votes to start, the Yahoo rankings will be included for the Week 3 Consensus Power Rankings.)
NFL Week 2 SuperPower Rankings
New England dominated the Chargers on Sunday, but clearly it hurt the Chargers more than it helped the Patriots.
Like college football polls, people don’t like dropping teams when they don’t lose. New England barely took any spots away from the Colts, only passing them in MSNBC and SI, despite the Colts struggling against the Titans. However, the margin between the Colts and Patriots was so thin last week that it’s enough for the Pats to pass the Colts in the SuperPower Rankings, with added help from passing the Chargers in CBS for #2 and breaking the tie in USA Today.
Meanwhile, the Chargers slip after being the only other team in the top three in every single ranking before the season and after Week 1. By itself, having the offense struggle against the mighty Bears D and falling to the Patriots shouldn’t reflect too badly on the Chargers, and indeed the Chargers don’t fall that far (no fall in Fox and only a one-spot dip in ESPN), but the Chargers didn’t look like the third-best team in the nation against the Patriots. They fall to sixth in four rankings, eighth in the SI rankings, and fifth in the two Yahoo rankings, with the Steelers (in perhaps a bit of a hasty jump given the quality of their opposition), Broncos (also dubious given their reliance on last-second field goals against lowly Buffalo and Oakland), and Cowboys (the new #3) being the chief beneficiaries. The Chargers should be able to take a breather and allow people to get a true gauge of the state of their offense against the Packers.
Outside the top six, the Bears and Ravens remain strong while the surprises at 2-0 – the Packers, Niners, Texans, and Lions – divide the group. The first three are generally thought to be for real; the Lions, who have defeated two lousy teams in close games, aren’t. The Packers have the benefit of three of the four teams directly ahead of them in last week’s SuperPower Rankings losing, which basically guaranteed them a ticket to the Top 10. The Texans round out the Top 10 with the Niners close behind. One really divisive team is the Cardinals; three lists have them 15th or 14th, five within a spot of 20th, and one of the Yahoo lists has them as low as 24th.
The Bengals take a massive slip after their D played awful against the Browns. Either the D is going to be a massive seesaw from week to week or their strong performance Week 1 was more due to an iffy Ravens offense (they did lose McNair in the middle of the game). Which in turn, doesn’t reflect well on the Jets D. The Seahawks also fumbled away their Top 10 placement this week, setting up a game between teams that need recoveries from surprising losses, and the Saints take a big tumble after falling to lowly Tampa Bay – an upset I called, by the way.
At the bottom, the Browns’ win leaves the Falcons with the bottom spot all to themselves, although the Chiefs may have something to say about that. The Chiefs’ drop is mostly attributable to a number of surprises from the bottom; in addition to Cleveland, the Bucs won and the Raiders were a dubious timeout away from doing the same. The Dolphins and Bills also have to curse their former fellow cellar-dwellers, including Arizona’s stunning upset of the Seahawks.
Read the complete Consensus Power Rankings through Week 2 of NFL action here.
Football Lineal Title Update
The Football Hub is updated with all the wonderful lineal title changes of the past week. On the NFL side, Houston’s defeat of Carolina sets up a lineal title unification bout when the Colts face the Texans this coming week. Both of the college football titles that changed hands last week change hands again this week, and the 2004 Utah title is back in the hands of the team that created it.
Florida faces Ole Miss this coming week, while Utah faces UNLV, Ohio State faces Northwestern, and in the most likely title change (which isn’t saying much), LSU faces South Carolina. The 2004 Auburn Title is two weeks away from a potential unification with the Princeton Title; LSU needs to survive SC and Tulane, while Florida needs to survive Mississippi and Auburn. With Auburn’s struggles, SC is the most likely upset, but LSU is so strong it might not matter.
While my College Football Rankings won’t be released until this coming week, I can tell you one interesting fact about how they’re shaking out. Notre Dame is currently infamously embroiled in futility, and had I released the college football rankings this week, they would place dead last. Ouch.
Your Hub for All Things Football
I’ve added a new section to the web site – Morgan Wick Sports – that will serve as a home base for the Lineal Titles, the SuperPower Rankings, and the College Football Rankings. This week’s SuperPower Rankings are now available there. Go to morganwick.freehostia.com/sports/football.
The NFL lineal title history is now located there as well, and the ATH Drinking Game is now here.
Da Blog in LA Recap (what prodigious output!)
For the most part, my week in LA consisted of little more than hanging out around my dad’s house. I had some enlightening conversations with him about heavy topics and briefly caught up with some family, but not much happened.
Some catchup from the week that was:
- NFL Lineal Title news: Carolina picked up the core Lineal Title off the Rams. They face Houston next week. The Colts will be defending against the Titans next week. If Houston and the Colts win unification would come Week 3. Atlanta and New Orleans are rooting for Carolina and Tennessee to win respectively.
- After a week of no CFB lineal changes we get changes galore this week. Florida held on to the Princeton title against Troy, while LSU demolished Virginia Tech to retain the 2004 Auburn title. But Boise State falls to Washington while BYU loses to UCLA, making unification between the 2006 Boise State and 2004 Utah titles likely. UCLA plays Utah next while Washington plays Ohio State; the latter has a very high risk of averting unification. Unification is certain, however, if both teams retain.
- SuperPower Rankings will start being hosted on the web site tommorow. They are currently delayed; Sporting News is joining the race but SI appears to be dropping out and if USA Today has any power rankings ongoing they don’t have this week’s up yet. My Week 2 picks are partly dependent on the SuperPower Rankings and are similarly delayed.
- The voting-method-for-100-greatest-movies poll received no votes whatsoever in almost two months. I’m ashamed of you.
The web site picks’ mock fantasy football league
(We’re still working on the title.)
The idea is simple: simulate a fantasy football season based on the draft boards of many of the leading sports sites. I don’t know if you trust the same sites that give you the stats and scores to give you the best picks in fantasy, but we’ll do this anyway. I’ll hold a draft involving the boards for the following sites.
During the season, we’ll use ESPN.com standard scoring and rosters but use total points, not H2H. All picks will be based on the best available player on each service’s draft board until late in the draft, when any positional deficiecies will be taken care of in the following order: RB, QB, WR, TE, DEF, K. After each week, any player not in the top 200 overall, and also not in the top for their position (16 for kickers, 24 for defenses, TEs, and QBs, 40 for WRs, 50 for RBs), will be autocut and new selections will be made to replace them; worst team gets the free agent with the most points, unless they need to make up positional deficiencies for any reason next week, or unless their rankings are dynamically updated. For the first week, starters are determined based on the draft board, and thereafter by most points among contending players on a team, unless rankings are dynamically updated.
Teams are listed by first-round draft order and with their first round picks, Week 1 starters in bold:
- NFL.com: LaDainian Tomlinson, RB, Chargers
- ESPN.com: Steven Jackson, RB, Rams
- CBS Sports.com: Shaun Alexander, RB, Seahawks
- Fox Sports.com: Larry Johnson, RB, Chiefs
- SI.com: Frank Gore, RB, 49ers
- Yahoo: Joseph Addai, RB, Colts
- USA Today: Rudi Johnson, RB, Bengals (ends a streak of four straight picks ranked 3rd or 4th on their respective boards)
- Sporting News: Brian Westbrook, RB, Eagles
Here’s the rest of the draft:
- SN: Willie Parker, RB, Steelers
- USAT: Peyton Manning, QB, Colts
- YAH: Laurence Maroney, RB, Patriots
- SI: Travis Henry, RB, Broncos
- FOX: Willis McGahee, RB, Ravens
- CBS: Reggie Bush, RB, Saints
- ESPN: Steve Smith, WR, Panthers (ooh, slow start…)
- NFL: Ronnie Brown, RB, Dolphins
- NFL: Drew Brees, QB, Saints (huh? why not Palmer?)
- ESPN: Marvin Harrison, WR, Colts (but what about a QB?)
- CBS: Carson Palmer, QB, Bengals
- FOX: Terrell Owens, WR, Cowboys (where to start…)
- SI: Edgerrin James, RB, Cardinals (talk about controversy)
- YAH: Maurice Jones-Drew, RB, Jaguars (ditto)
- USAT: Torry Holt, WR, Rams (both ESPN and USAT have not selected second RBs, worrying me)
- SN: Clinton Portis, RB, Redskins (another RB controversy)
- SN: Chad Johnson, WR, Bengals (note: no QB selected yet)
- USAT: Larry Fitzgerald, WR, Cardinals
- YAH: Brandon Jacobs, RB, Giants (four! four RBs selected already!)
- SI: Thomas Jones, RB, Jets (ditto)
- FOX: Reggie Wayne, WR, Colts (still no QB selected, like YAH and SI)
- CBS: Cedric Benson, RB, Bears
- ESPN: Deuce McAllister, RB, Saints (finally select a second RB but still no QB)
- NFL: Marshawn Lynch, RB, Bills
- NFL: Tom Brady, QB, Patriots (I smell QB controversy; 26th on its board, and next would be #32 Ahman Green)
- ESPN: Carnell Williams, RB, Buccaneers (NFL robbed ESPN of Brady for no reason)
- CBS: Roy Williams, WR, Lions (first WR picked by CBS in this draft)
- FOX: Antonio Gates, TE, Chargers (Fox has him ranked 26th! It is the fifth round, but shouldn’t they at least take a QB first?)
- SI: Randy Moss, WR, Patriots (finally ending the RB streak, but where’s the QB?)
- YAH: TJ Houshmandzadeh, WR, Bengals (ditto)
- USAT: Marion Barber III, RB, Cowboys (last team to take a second RB)
- SN: Javon Walker, WR, Broncos
- SN: Donald Driver, WR, Packers (when will they take a QB?)
- USAT: Plaxico Burress, WR, Giants (third WR taken, suggesting a WR-centric strategy)
- YAH: Marques Colston, WR, Saints (still need a QB)
- SI: Andre Johnson, WR, Texans (ditto, and Bulger is next on SI board… where will he go after 5 1/2?)
- FOX: Ahman Green, RB, Texans (also still need a QB)
- CBS: Marc Bulger, QB, Rams (as with NFL, a QB controversy)
- ESPN: Jamal Lewis, RB, Browns (ranked ahead of Bulger on ESPN board)
- NFL: Anquan Boldin, WR, Cardinals (last team to take a WR, after 3 RBs and 2 QBs)
- NFL: Adrian Peterson, RB, Vikings
- ESPN: Chester Taylor, RB, Vikings (ahead of Peterson on ESPN board)
- CBS: Donovan McNabb, QB, Eagles (ESPN rules allow a max 4 QBs, so CBS can only take one more!)
- FOX: Julius Jones, RB, Cowboys (thru 7 rounds, Fox has 4 RBs, 2 WRs, and a TE, but is one of five with no QBs when CBS has three! There should be only two no-QB teams! I need to add a trade rule)
- SI: Lee Evans, WR, Bills (three straight WRs after four straight RBs)
- YAH: Jerious Norwood, RB, Cardinals (five! five RBs in just seven rounds!)
- USAT: Kellen Winslow II, TE, Browns (USAT has had a very balanced draft, with a third WR instead of RB the only shortcoming, including being one of only three with a QB)
- SN: Tony Gonzalez, TE, Chiefs
- SN: Darrell Jackson, WR, 49ers (Through 8: 3 RB, 4 WR, 1 TE. Shortcomings: QB, DEF, K.)
- USAT: Jeremy Shockey, TE, Giants (Through 8: 2 RB, 1 QB, 3 WR, 2 TE. Shortcomings: DEF, K.)
- YAH: Hines Ward, WR, Steelers (Through 8: 5 RB, 3 WR. Shortcomings: QB, TE, DEF, K.)
- SI: Lavernaues Coles, WR, Jets (Through 8: 4 RB, 4 WR. Shortcomings: QB, TE, DEF, K. Very streaky with streaks of 4 straight RBs and WRs.)
- FOX: Brandon Jackson, RB, Packers (Through 8: 5 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE. Shortcomings: QB, DEF, K.)
- CBS: Jon Kitna, QB, Lions (Through 8: 4 QB, 3 RB, 1 WR. Shortcomings: WR, TE, DEF, K. That’s it, CBS can’t take any more QBs. Now there should only be one QB-less team.)
- ESPN: Matt Hasselbeck, QB, Seahawks (ESPN should have picked up a QB a long time ago, but now at least half the teams have QBs. Through 8: 1 QB, 5 RB, 2 WR. Shortcomings: TE, DEF, K. After three rounds with only one RB, ESPN went on a four straight RB tear.)
- NFL: Tatum Bell, RB, Lions (Through 8: 2 QB, 5 RB, 1 WR. Shortcomings: WR, TE, DEF, K.)
|
|
Da Blog in LA
Tomorrow, I’ll be flying to Los Angeles for a week and a half with my dad. I hope to post regular blog posts about my experience there under the label “Da Blog in LA”. I’ll probably be bored out of my skull there, but what the hey.
Meanwhile, if you want my NFL picks every week, they should be available here every early Tuesday morning. Please keep in mind at all times that I know nothing about football.
All the college football lineal titleholders have retained so far, with only BYU still playing.